Amazon Web Services’ suspension and expulsion of the Parler social media network sent shudders throughout the tech world. However, the reasons for this shock had little to do with politics. Essentially, it reveals why cloud vendor power is becoming a significant concern in an increasingly interconnected marketplace.
Because of this cold, hard fact, forward-thinking organizations need to consider cloud adoption considerations and take steps on how to avoid vendor lock-in in cloud computing when crafting their latest web application development or Software as a Service (SaaS). Following a cloud agnostic architecture makes sense as part of this approach if you want to keep consistency in your services offered. It’s the best way to ensure your platform remains accessible no matter the decisions of any single cloud hosting plans or cloud provider, highlighting the importance of business continuity and cloud computing.
Ultimately, the cost of switching vendors combined with significant downtime highlights vendor lock-in risks. With business continuity and cloud computing in mind, here's a high-level overview of cloud agnostic architecture and why you should be keeping it in mind when going through cloud adoption considerations.
Some aspects of a single cloud architecture seem alluring on the surface. For example, implementing devops and cloud strategy and managing your development team’s codebase becomes easier when using one cloud hosting plans. When the goal is achieving web application development as quickly as possible, a single cloud approach seems to help achieve that high rate of velocity.
However, the risks of this approach remain numerous. Developing your application to work on AWS, for example, makes it virtually impossible to switch to Microsoft Azure or another cloud hosting provider without a complete rebuild.
We already talked about why the AWS suspension of Parler matters for businesses. As a result, they spent significant resources finding a new host and subsequently re-deploying their applications and data. This essentially gives public cloud providers the power to completely shut down a company or platform as a service.
Companies that follow the single cloud approach lack a certain measure of flexibility. For instance, they are unable to deploy an application to a client’s private cloud without difficulty.
Ultimately, they also remain beholden to their cloud provider’s choices for tools and other technologies supporting cloud development. You are even beholden to any price increases or additional charges because the alternative, moving to a new host, is so much more expensive. In short, vendor lock-in remains a risk worth avoiding for any company.
Beyond avoiding single cloud risks, a cloud-agnostic approach provides many other benefits to companies following a multi-cloud strategy. A recent study noted that 81% of enterprises leveraging the public cloud use multiple providers. Simply put, vendor lock-ins are not a wise option in the current cloud market, pointing to the strategies for seamless cloud migration.
A cloud-agnostic approach to web development is rapidly becoming a necessity. A recent study noted that 81% of enterprises leveraging the public cloud use multiple providers with shared hosting. Another report highlighted the fact that these companies use an average of five different cloud providers. Simply put, vendor lock-in is not a wise option in the current cloud market.
Using multiple cloud hosts provides a notable boost in website performance. cloud deployment and management simply switch between cloud providers to find the one currently boasting the fastest throughput. This multi-cloud strategy helps companies save significant money over time; especially ones with a high number of cloud workloads.
Following a cloud-agnostic architecture requires a few considerations when architecting a web application.
First off, leveraging a microservices architecture makes sense, since it breaks the application into smaller components, making it easier to build, test, and maintain. Of course, this architectural approach also works for any web or mobile application.
Containers are a relatively recent technological innovation that relies on virtualization to encapsulate an application and all its dependencies. Using containers helps the development team quickly deploy applications into build, test, and production environments.
When used for cloud deployments, however, updating applications across all the different cloud hosts becomes a breeze. In short, containers are a must for any cloud-agnostic project.
When choosing the tools, services, and frameworks for a cloud-agnostic project, ensure their compatibility across a wide range of cloud hosts. For example, Docker is a de facto industry standard for containers. Additionally, consider Kubernetes for organizing and orchestrating container deployments. In a similar manner, choose cloud providers based on their support for the services in your company’s toolbox.
The tools mentioned earlier – Docker and Kubernetes – also play a big role in successfully adopting the DevOps methodology. Another major component in achieving the goals of DevOps involves the use of automation. Obviously, this needs to be a consideration in any cloud-agnostic architecture project. Crafting a continuous integration (CI) pipeline where builds are tested and deployed in an automated fashion ensures updates and bug fixes happen as quickly as possible.
Making a commitment to a cloud-agnostic strategy requires some upfront effort, but its rewards remain numerous. When considering the myriad risks of vendor lock-in, however, it turns a smart strategic choice into an existential requirement.
NineTwoThree Studio helps corporations achieve their business goals by crafting state-of-the-art digital ventures, including mobile apps and web-based interactive projects. We also follow cloud-agnostic architecture principles when relevant. Our team boasts talented professionals well versed in guiding companies through the entire product lifecycle. Connect with us to discuss your next venture.
